# Deepinfo vs. Mandiant

URL: https://www.deepinfo.com/compare/mandiant/

CTI-led

Mandiant suits organizations that need incident responders and intelligence drawn from frontline investigations. Deepinfo suits teams that want continuous visibility of their external exposure, brand and vendors, worked through to a verified fix.

Most security programs need both kinds of help at some point. The question is which one you are buying now.

[Request demo](https://www.deepinfo.com/request-demo/)

## Before an Incident and During One.

One is a platform your team runs every week. The other is expertise you call on, with products built around it.

Deepinfo and Mandiant compared feature by feature

| Capability | Deepinfo | Mandiant |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Services |  |  |
| Incident response and forensics | No | Yes |
| Response retainers | No | Yes |
| External exposure |  |  |
| Attack surface management | EASM, each asset scanned layer by layer | Mandiant Attack Surface Management |
| Leaked credentials · Breach data and infostealer logs | Email breaches, infostealer devices, client and payment credentials | Digital Threat Monitoring |
| Brand impersonation | Lookalike domains, including confusable letters | Digital Threat Monitoring |
| Vulnerability ranking · Per CVE | CVSS, EPSS and CISA KEV side by side | Mandiant vulnerability intelligence |
| Delivery |  |  |
| Threat intelligence | Actor profiles, dark web search, curated news | Google Threat Intelligence, with Mandiant research |
| How you buy it | Platform subscription, priced by scope | Services, managed services and products |
| Company | Deepinfo, headquartered in Istanbul | Part of Google Cloud since 2022 |

Last reviewed: May 2, 2026. Mandiant rows reflect Google Cloud’s public product pages at that date; confirm current capabilities with Google Cloud. Product names are trademarks of their owners; Deepinfo is not affiliated with or endorsed by Google Cloud.

## Where Mandiant Is Strong.

When an adversary is already inside, *responders matter most.*

Mandiant’s investigators work breaches as their daily job, and its intelligence and yearly M-Trends report draw on that casework. When a breach has to be reconstructed to the standard a board or a regulator expects, that experience is what you pay for.

Deepinfo is not an incident response firm and does not try to be one.

## Where Deepinfo Is Strong.

Deepinfo is built for the long stretch between incidents, when exposure builds up quietly. Each attack surface issue carries its evidence and a state, and is marked verified resolved only when a rescan confirms the signal is gone.

[External Attack Surface Management](https://www.deepinfo.com/platform/easm/)

## Split the Work at the Incident Line.

Where the handoff sits when your program uses both.

1. **Map**

   Deepinfo discovers what you expose, including subsidiary and forgotten infrastructure, and keeps scanning it.
2. **Reduce**

   Your team works exposed services, leaked credentials and lookalike domains down, each through its own workflow.
3. **Respond**

   When an incident happens, responders lead. Per-asset history of DNS, certificates, WHOIS and ports shows what changed on an affected asset, and when.
4. **Feed back**

   What the investigation found becomes new seeds, discovery rules and notification rules, so that gap is watched from then on.

## Teams Working Between Incidents.

- [A defense manufacturer](https://www.deepinfo.com/customers/defense-manufacturer/): Monitors subsidiaries and tier-1 suppliers on one platform, with threat actor intelligence set up for its sector.
- [An industrial conglomerate](https://www.deepinfo.com/customers/industrial-conglomerate/): 30+ subsidiary brands monitored as separate portfolios, with a rolled-up view for the group.
- [A metropolitan municipality](https://www.deepinfo.com/customers/municipal-government/) (Government): Watches for impersonation of citizen-facing services and scans municipal infrastructure layer by layer.

- [Deepinfo vs. Recorded Future](https://www.deepinfo.com/compare/recorded-future/) (CTI-led)
- [Deepinfo vs. ZeroFox](https://www.deepinfo.com/compare/zerofox/) (CTI-led)
- [Deepinfo vs. Group-IB](https://www.deepinfo.com/compare/group-ib/) (CTI-led)
- [All Comparisons](https://www.deepinfo.com/compare/) (Compare)

## What Buyers Ask About Both.

**Is Deepinfo an incident response service?**

No. Deepinfo is a platform your own team runs. For an active intrusion you need responders, in-house or from a firm such as Mandiant.

**Can Deepinfo data help during an investigation?**

Yes. The platform keeps a history for each scanned layer, so responders can see when a DNS record, a certificate or a WHOIS record changed on an affected asset. The [Data & API](https://www.deepinfo.com/data-api/) tier adds DNS and WHOIS history for any domain, including ones you do not monitor.

**Mandiant sells attack surface management too. How do they compare?**

Run both on the same seed domains. Compare what each discovers, how each ranks what it finds, and what comes with it, such as breach data, lookalike domains and vendor scanning on the same scale.

**Does Deepinfo watch for leaked credentials and impersonation?**

Yes. Cyber Threat Intelligence covers email breaches, infostealer-infected devices and leaked client and payment credentials, and Brand Risk Protection watches lookalike domains, including ones built with confusable letters. Mandiant covers this ground with Digital Threat Monitoring.

**How does buying each one differ?**

Deepinfo is a platform subscription, priced by the scope you monitor; see [pricing](https://www.deepinfo.com/pricing/). Mandiant, part of Google Cloud since 2022, sells services, managed services and products.

## Close the Gaps Before an Incident.

Book a working demo on your domains.

[Request demo](https://www.deepinfo.com/request-demo/)