How Deepinfo compares to the alternatives you're evaluating.
Ten head-to-head comparisons grouped by category. CTI-led platforms, EASM-led platforms, and one adjacent category that comes up in evaluation conversations. Each page makes Deepinfo's case while staying accurate on what the competitor does well.
Compared with the four heaviest CTI vendors.
Recorded Future, Mandiant, ZeroFox, and Group-IB lead with threat intelligence in different shapes. Deepinfo runs CTI as one of four integrated modules sharing the same internet-scale dataset, so the intelligence is correlated with EASM, brand defense, and third-party monitoring out of the box.
vs. Recorded Future
CTI as a feed vs. CTI woven into your external surface picture. Deepinfo runs CTI as one module of a unified platform sharing one dataset across EASM, BRP, and TPRM.
Read the comparisonvs. Mandiant
IR consulting standard vs. continuous platform automation. Deepinfo runs every day at platform pricing instead of consultant rates, so a smaller share of incidents reaches the IR-engagement threshold.
Read the comparisonvs. ZeroFox
Brand defense over public data vs. brand defense plus the underlying internet-scale dataset. Deepinfo provides BRP as one module of an integrated platform across EASM, CTI, and TPRM.
Read the comparisonvs. Group-IB
CTI heritage with Russian/CIS regional ties vs. jurisdictionally clean modular platform. Deepinfo integrates CTI signal across the whole platform under a procurement-friendly jurisdiction.
Read the comparisonCompared with the five EASM and adjacent platforms.
CyCognito, Cortex Xpanse, Microsoft Defender EASM, Tenable, and Detectify all touch external attack surface management from different starting points. Deepinfo extends EASM with integrated CTI, BRP, and TPRM modules, plus an internet-scale dataset owned end-to-end.
vs. CyCognito
Both EASM-led, but CyCognito sells EASM-only at premium. Deepinfo extends with integrated CTI, BRP, and TPRM modules and a larger underlying dataset.
Read the comparisonvs. Cortex Xpanse
Palo Alto's EASM tied to Cortex XSIAM ecosystem vs. independent platform that integrates with whichever SIEM your team operates, with broader use cases beyond EASM.
Read the comparisonvs. Microsoft Defender EASM
Bundled-with-Microsoft option (former RiskIQ) vs. larger dataset, faster scans, and integrated CTI/BRP/TPRM modules independent of Microsoft licensing.
Read the comparisonvs. Tenable
VM-led with EASM as a recent add-on vs. EASM-first on an internet-scale dataset. Deepinfo adds the surface that VM-anchored EASM doesn't see.
Read the comparisonvs. Detectify
DAST application testing on known assets vs. discovery of the assets that DAST tools assume as input, plus monitoring of the threat landscape around them.
Read the comparisonCompared with the platforms buyers sometimes evaluate alongside.
Some categories aren't direct alternatives but show up in evaluation conversations because the workflows touch each other. The comparison page explains how the two run alongside, not against.
See it on your own surface.
The free threat exposure report runs Deepinfo against your domain and emails the result within 24 hours. The clearest comparison is your own data.