Underwriting that runs on continuous evidence.
Cyber insurance underwriting runs on questionnaires that go stale within months. Cyber Insurance Assessment replaces the questionnaire as primary evidence with continuous external monitoring of the insured organization, giving underwriters real posture data instead of self-reported answers.
Underwriting evidence that matches reality.
Underwriting teams, broker teams, and insurance buyers all touch this workflow. The question: what is the insured organization's actual external posture, and how is it changing? Pre-Deepinfo, the answer comes from annual questionnaires that vary by insurer and rarely catch posture drift. Post-Deepinfo, the answer comes from continuous external monitoring with risk-scored output.
Insurers use this evidence at underwriting, renewal, and during incident-claim cycles. Brokers use it during placement to position insureds against the risk pool. Insureds use it to demonstrate continuous posture improvement during renewal cycles, which has direct premium implications.
Outcomes: underwriting decisions made on current data; renewal cycles factor in posture improvement; claim disputes have observational evidence rather than questionnaire snapshots.
External evidence built for insurance workflows.
Continuous external monitoring of the insured organization. Risk scoring on a unified scale. Per-vendor scoring for portfolio-level exposure. Audit-export formats for underwriting and claims documentation.
Continuous external monitoring.
Seven-layer scanning across the insured's external surface. Drift detection catches posture changes that affect underwriting between renewal cycles.
Risk scoring on a unified scale.
Per-asset and per-domain scores backed by EPSS exploit-prediction and CISA KEV active-exploitation flags. Apples-to-apples comparison across the insured-organization pool.
Per-vendor scoring for portfolio context.
TPRM extends monitoring to the insured's vendor portfolio. Insurers can scope underwriting to include vendor concentration risk, not just the insured's own posture.
Audit-export for underwriting + claims.
PDF, Excel, structured CSV/JSON formats. Continuous evidence supports underwriting at placement, renewal, and during claim cycles.
Insurance use cases that buy on evidence.
An international insurance group
Continuous monitoring across vendors and subsidiary brands with rolled-up group-level visibility.
Read the storyThird-party risk management
Continuously assess and score the security posture of every organization you work with.
Read the use caseSecurity risk scoring
Quantify external risk with continuous, objective scores across your organization and third parties.
Read the use case“Underwriting on continuous evidence instead of stale questionnaires shifts the conversation. We now go into renewal with fresh external posture data, not a six-month-old self-assessment.”
Related use cases.
Quantified external risk, scored consistently.
Risk scores are useful when they reflect real-world exploitation, not theoretical severity, and when the math is consistent across the organization and its third parties.
See use case USE CASEAudit-ready evidence, continuously kept current.
Audit cycles fail when the evidence is six months old.
See use case USE CASEDiscover every internet-facing asset, continuously.
Most security teams know about 60-80% of their organization's external attack surface.
See use caseSee evidence-based external risk data for underwriting.
Book a demo. We'll walk through the underwriting and claim use cases against your specific evaluation criteria.