Compare
Compare Deepinfo With the Tools You’re Weighing.
Side-by-side comparisons, grouped by where each vendor starts: attack surface management, threat intelligence, or a neighboring category.
Each page says what the other product does well, where Deepinfo goes further, and when the two belong side by side rather than in competition.
| EASM | CTI | BRP | TPRM | DSI | Outside Deepinfo | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EASM-led | ||||||
| CyCognito | covers | does not | does not | does not | does not | covers |
| Cortex Xpanse | covers | does not | does not | does not | does not | does not |
| Microsoft Defender EASM | covers | does not | does not | does not | does not | does not |
| Tenable | covers | does not | does not | does not | does not | covers |
| Detectify | covers | does not | does not | does not | does not | covers |
| Censys | covers | does not | does not | does not | covers | does not |
| CTI-led | ||||||
| Recorded Future | covers | covers | covers | covers | does not | does not |
| Mandiantusually complementary · incident response | covers | covers | covers | does not | does not | covers |
| ZeroFox | covers | covers | covers | does not | does not | does not |
| Group-IB | covers | covers | covers | does not | does not | covers |
| Brandefense | covers | covers | covers | covers | does not | does not |
| Adjacent | ||||||
| Cymulate | alongside | |||||
coversdoes not
A dot: the product overlaps that module, or works outside it · one index under all
Tools That Start From the Attack Surface.
Each one finds and watches internet-facing assets, from a different starting point. Deepinfo adds threat intelligence, brand monitoring and vendor risk on one index.
Deepinfo vs. CyCognito
CyCognito pairs attack surface management with active testing of exposed applications. Deepinfo pairs it with threat intelligence, brand and vendor monitoring on its own index.
Deepinfo vs. Cortex Xpanse
Attack surface management inside the Palo Alto Networks Cortex family, compared with a platform that works independently of any one vendor’s stack.
Deepinfo vs. Microsoft Defender EASM
Microsoft’s attack surface product, which grew out of RiskIQ, compared with a platform that does not depend on Microsoft licensing.
Deepinfo vs. Tenable
A vulnerability-management vendor with an attack surface offering, compared with a platform built outside-in on its own internet index.
Deepinfo vs. Censys
Internet intelligence for search, investigation and the SOC from its own Internet Map, compared with an exposure program on a domain-centric index.
Deepinfo vs. Detectify
Application-layer security testing, compared with discovery and monitoring across the whole external surface. The two can run together.
Vendors That Lead With Threat Intelligence.
Each delivers intelligence in a different shape. In Deepinfo, Cyber Threat Intelligence is one module, next to the assets, brands and vendors the other modules already track.
Intelligence
Deepinfo vs. Recorded Future
A threat intelligence specialist, compared with intelligence that arrives tied to your external surface.
Response
Deepinfo vs. Mandiant
Incident response and threat intelligence expertise, compared with a platform that monitors exposure continuously, before an incident.
Brand and intelligence
Deepinfo vs. ZeroFox
The HNTR Platform: threat intelligence, brand and executive protection and attack surface intelligence from an analyst-led vendor, compared with five modules on one index.
External risk
Deepinfo vs. Brandefense
Threat intelligence for external risk across attack surface, digital risk and vendors, compared with the same four areas on an index Deepinfo collects itself.
Investigations
Deepinfo vs. Group-IB
Threat intelligence, attack surface and digital risk products next to incident response from one provider, compared with a modular platform on its own index.
Attack Simulation Runs Alongside, Not Against.
Breach and attack simulation tests whether your controls catch known attack techniques. External exposure management finds what your organization shows the internet in the first place.
The two meet in shared evaluations because the workflows touch. The Cymulate comparison explains where each one fits in a single program.
DeepinfoWhat can an attacker see and use?
Attack simulationWould our controls catch this?
-
Discover (Deepinfo)the domains, subdomains and IPs your organization exposes
-
Prioritize (Deepinfo)every CVE carries CVSS, EPSS and CISA KEV
-
Validate (Attack simulation)whether your detections and controls catch the techniques that matter
-
Verify (Deepinfo)a rescan no longer finds the signal
Questions About These Comparisons
How current are these comparisons?
Each page shows the date it was last reviewed. Vendors change their products, so confirm current capabilities with each vendor before you decide.
Where do the claims come from?
Deepinfo rows come from the platform itself: its data layers, issue states, match types and API reference. Anything we could not verify against the platform is left out. Rows about other vendors summarize their public positioning.
What doesn’t Deepinfo do?
What is the quickest way to compare on real data?
A demo on your domain: before the call we run discovery and a first scan against it, so the walk-through opens on your own assets and the findings on them.
Are you affiliated with these vendors?
No. Product names are trademarks of their owners, and no vendor on these pages has reviewed or endorsed the comparisons.
Why compare Deepinfo with a breach and attack simulation vendor?
Because buyers sometimes evaluate them in a single cycle. The two answer different questions, and the Cymulate page explains how they run side by side.
The Clearest Comparison Is Your Own Data.
Book a demo on your domain and bring the product you’re comparing it with.