Fraud Prevention
Work Fraud From the Leak Before the Chargeback.
Card fraud and account takeover begin with data that surfaced somewhere else: a card number in a market listing, a customer login in an infostealer log, a lookalike domain waiting for traffic. Your fraud team gets each one as a record it can filter, export and close.
Cards
card (masked) 4821 · Luhn ✓ · not expired · CVV present · 3 sightings
State resolved
Filter bin in ['YOUR_BIN_1','YOUR_BIN_2']
Logins
sso.acme.example/login · j.(masked) · target service
Lures
acrne.example · fuzzy ·
dnsssl
Ranked usable cards first: Luhn-valid, not expired, CVV attached, seen recently
Where Fraud Gets Its Start.
A disputed transaction is the end of a chain. The earliest links are visible from outside, to anyone who looks.
Cards
Leaked Card Numbers
Numbers turn up in leak dumps, market listings and paste sites, sometimes with expiry and CVV. Until the issuer acts, the card stays usable.
Logins
Customer Credentials
A customer’s infected device leaks every saved login, including the one to your portal. The breach isn’t yours. The takeover risk is.
Lures
Lookalike Infrastructure
A domain one character away from yours, a fake app, a search result pointing to a fake support line. Each one collects the card numbers and logins that later go up for sale.
Each Fraud Pattern Maps to a Capability.
Card-Not-Present Fraud
Leaked cards with BIN, issuer, brand, expiry, CVV presence, a Luhn check and sighting history, filtered to your ranges.
Account Takeover
Customer logins to your services found in leaked credential data, each with the URL, the username and the service it opens.
Phishing and Payment Redirection
Domains matched to your brand names, including fuzzy and confusable matches, monitored for DNS, mail, certificate and web activity, each with a risk score timeline.
Fake Apps
App listings that present themselves as yours. Coverage is confirmed per engagement.
Fake Support and Refund Pages
Search results that use your brand to send customers to pages you don’t run. Coverage is confirmed per engagement.
From Leaked Record to Closed Case.
-
01
Scope
Filter to what is yours: your BIN ranges, the login URLs of your services, the brand names customers know.
-
02
Rank
Put usable cards first: Luhn-valid, unexpired, CVV attached, seen recently. Put customer logins to high-value services ahead of the rest.
-
03
Act
Reissue or block cards, force resets or step-up checks on accounts, and send confirmed lookalikes to takedown. Those decisions run in your payment and identity systems.
-
04
Close
Mark each record resolved, risk accepted, ignored or false positive, one at a time or in bulk by filter. A decision can be reverted.
Records Your Fraud Stack Can Consume.
Payment and client credentials each have search, export and bulk state actions in the API. The filter that finds the records also closes them.
A fraud team pulls new leaked cards on its BINs into the rules engine it already runs, and closes all cards on a BIN after a reissue in one request.
curl -X POST \
"https://api.deepinfo.com/v1/cti/compromised-payment-credentials/search:export?format=csv" \
-H "apikey: YOUR_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"filters": {
"must": [
{ "name": "bin", "type": "in",
"value": ["YOUR_BIN_1", "YOUR_BIN_2"] }
]
}
}'
The Lures Start as Domains.
One brand name and a candidate for each match type, including lookalike letters from other alphabets.
-
acme.example
-
acme.test
-
acme-login.example
-
acrne.example, r + n for m
-
acem-verify.example, swapped “me”
-
аcme.example, U+0430 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER A
resolves as xn--cme-5cd.example
-
аcme-login.example, U+0430 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER A
resolves as xn--cme-login-zyh.example
-
aсem.example, swapped “me” · U+0441 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ES
resolves as xn--aem-4ed.example
-
secure-aсem.example, swapped “me” · U+0441 CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER ES
resolves as xn--secure-aem-jwi.example
Use This Data in Your Tools
The domains the index sees each day are also a daily file and a search API, for teams that run their own lookalike matching or enrich alerts in a SIEM.
Questions About Fraud Prevention
Does the Deepinfo Platform block fraudulent transactions?
No. It surfaces leaked cards, leaked customer logins and lookalike infrastructure as records. Blocking, reissuing and step-up decisions stay in your payment and identity systems, fed by search or export.
Can card monitoring be limited to our own BINs?
Yes. BIN is a searchable field alongside issuer name and country, card brand, type and level. That filter also drives exports and bulk state changes.
Where does the card data come from?
From the markets, leak dumps and paste sites where card numbers are posted. Each record keeps where the card was listed and how often it was seen.
What counts as a client credential?
A login to one of your services that belongs to a customer rather than an employee, found in leaked credential data. Each record carries the URL it was used on, the username and the service behind it.
Can we catch a lookalike domain before it goes live?
Yes, if it is matched while still parked. Rules match names as they come into the index, and include_ extends a new rule to names already there. Once your team approves a match, monitoring shows when it gets a mail server, a certificate or a live web page.
See What’s Circulating With Your Name.
Book a demo and we’ll walk your fraud team through card, login and lookalike records scoped to your BINs, services and brands.